Skip to content

Categories:

What Really Determines How We Live Our Lives?

Email this article to a friend Email this article to a friend

For years I’ve thought that our lives—what we do, think, feel, and perceive—were the direct result of our beliefs and our conditionings.  When I looked at the lives and beliefs of over 13,000 clients, I noticed a very close correlation.

In the past few weeks I’ve had reason to rethink that conclusion.  I’ve identified a  couple of steps between beliefs and how we live our lives, so I no longer think there is a direct connection.

In order to explain what the actual connection is, let me briefly remind you of my three posts last year on “occurring.” (See http://mortylefkoe.com/121509, http://mortylefkoe.com/12229, http://mortylefkoe.com/122909)  Most people are not aware that the way reality shows up or occurs for them is not the same as what’s actually “out there” in the world.

For example, if something you’re about to do occurs to you as difficult, for you it really is difficult.  For you, the difficulty is a fact. Actually, the project might require skills that you don’t have or perhaps you aren’t confident about your ability to do it successfully. But the project itself isn’t difficult.  Difficult is in our minds.  Only the requirements of the project are in the world.

So there is a profound difference between reality and how reality shows up for us, and most people usually never make that distinction.

Back to my new realization.  It now seems to me that what determines our thoughts, feelings, behavior, etc. at any given moment is the way people and events (and even our internal thoughts) occur to us, moment by moment.  And, for us, reality is this occurring—not how reality really is.

Are beliefs and conditionings involved at all?  Yes, they are.  The connection between our beliefs and conditionings and how things show up or occur for us is   the meaning we are giving reality moment by moment.

Here’s how I think it works: We have beliefs and conditionings from earlier in life.  When we interact with any situation, our existing beliefs and conditionings are the primary determinant of the meaning we give the situation.  That meaning in turn determines how it occurs for us.  And that occurring then determines how we react to the situation.

Here’s an illustration to make this real.  Imagine you have several beliefs, including What makes me good enough or important is having people think well of me. The situation you encounter is: You’re with a group of friends, all of whom have the same opinion about something.  You disagree.  That’s reality.  Given the beliefs you have, the meaning you might give this reality is: “It’s dangerous to disagree with my friends because that might result in them not liking me or thinking less of me.”  Given that meaning, the situation probably will occur for you as uncomfortable and you will feel resistance to speak up about your disagreement.   And given this way the situation showed up for you, you probably would not say anything.

Can you see that your beliefs would lead you to give reality the meaning you did?  … And can you see that given that meaning, the situation would occur to you as it did?  … And finally, can you see that your behavior probably would be consistent with how the situation occurred to you? …

When I mentioned this new way of looking at the relationship between our beliefs and the way we live our lives, one friend said to me last week: Why are you complicating the situation?  If beliefs and conditionings cause the meaning, which causes the occurring, which determines how we life our lives, so what if there are a couple of elements between the beliefs and how we live our lives?

Here’s why this distinction can be very important.  If our lives are the direct result of our beliefs and conditionings, then we could not change our lives until we found and eliminated them.  But if our lives are the result of the meaning we give any given situation, then it might be possible to change that meaning, thereby changing how we will act and feel in any given situation, without eliminating the beliefs.

I think that it is possible to do that and I’m in the process of conducting an experiment with 20 people over a ten-week period to see what is required to change the meaning we automatically give to situations.  So far it looks like it can be done.  I personally have done it many times, even though it can be difficult to do it consistently.

Now in the long run you still would want to get rid of the relevant negative beliefs and conditionings because, if you don’t, the next time a similar situation comes up, you’ll probably form the same meaning, which you will then have to change.  On the other hand, if you eliminate the negative beliefs, you’ll form a different, more positive meaning the next time, and you won’t have to change it.

At this point you probably are asking: So how do you change the meaning we automatically and unconsciously give events every minute?  The same way we eliminate the meaning we gave the events that led to beliefs as a child.  Give the events two or three different meanings so that you can make real that the meaning you gave the situation is not “the truth,” and then realize you never saw the meaning in reality.  You only can see reality; meaning is always in our mind.

Also, it seems that some people are able to ignore or transcend how things show up for them. I’ve observed a few people who seem to be successful financially, in their careers, and in other aspects of their lives (such as dealing with eating/weight issues)—who still have a bunch of negative self-esteem beliefs.  That wouldn’t make sense if our lives were consistent with our beliefs.  But given what now appears to be true, as I’ve described above, these people either are changing the meaning of situations constantly or are transcending the way things show up for them.

People who do the latter seem to be able to say to themselves: “Yes, the world is occurring as difficult, or me as inadequate, etc., but so what?  I don’t care about reality (how the world occurs to me), I’m going for it anyway.”

In looking at my own life I can see that I’ve done that from time to time.  I have  purposes or goals that I am so committed to that I can totally ignore how things occur for me.  One example is I have decided to drastically cut down my consumption of sugar and have just a square or two of chocolate after dinner and none during the day.  Most days after lunch I feel a desire for chocolate.  I notice that feeling and ignore it, saying silently to myself: “I don’t care if I feel like eating chocolate, I’m not going to do it.”  There is no struggle or effect and I don’t think about eating chocolate any more after I have that thought.  It’s as if my commitment is so much greater than the way my desire for chocolate shows up for me after lunch that the desire for chocolate feels irrelevant.

I’ll have more to say about changing the meaning you have given a situation and transcending how the world occurs to us a few weeks after the Lefkoe Freedom Experiment is complete and I have the results from 20 experimenters.  In the meantime, check it out yourself.  See if you can notice that you generally are not aware of the difference between reality and how reality occurs or shows up for you.  And then see if you can change that occurring by changing the meaning you had just given the situation in front of you.

If you haven’t yet eliminated at least one of your limiting self-esteem beliefs using the Lefkoe Belief Process, go to http://www.recreateyourlife.com/free where you can eliminate one limiting belief free.

Please feel free to share my blog posts with anyone you think might be interested (as long as you tell people where they came from) and to provide a link from your own website or blog to this blog: http://mortylefkoe.com.

To purchase DVD programs that we guarantee to eliminate eight of the most common daily problems people face, go to http://www.recreateyourlife.com/store.

Follow me on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/mortylefkoe and join our fan page on Facebook (http://facebook.com/recreateyourlife) to get my latest insights on the role of beliefs in our lives.

Finally, to receive notice of new blog posts, please fill out the following form.

Copyright © 2010 Morty Lefkoe

Share your enthusiasm with your Facebook or Twitter friends, just click a button below.
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in Uncategorized.


Make Your Arguments a Thing of the Past

Email this article to a friend Email this article to a friend

Did I ever tell you about the time I gave myself an award for “‘Getting Off It’ the Fastest”?

Well, I’m going to tell you right now because I think it will make a profound difference in your relationships with people, especially your loved ones.

When I married Shelly almost 29 years ago I was a mess.  I had just been divorced for a second time and was getting depressed frequently.  When we argued, which happened frequently, my way of coping with upset was to withdraw … for a couple of days!  Shelly, on the other hand, would “get off it” (let go of the upset) in an hour or so and then wonder why I was reacting to something that had ended hours or even days before.

As I used The Lefkoe Method (TLM) to eliminate beliefs and conditionings, the time it took me to let go of my upset decreased until, like Shelly, I could get off it in an hour or so after the argument was over.

At some point we created a friendly competition to see who could get off it first, in other words, who could let go of the upset totally and be back in relationship with the other person first. I ultimately acquired the ability to do that during an argument (as opposed to after it was over) and being able to stop right in the middle of it and just smile and say: “I’m sorry that whatever I am doing is upsetting you.  Is there anything I can do to resolve this?  I love you.”

Here’s what’s important about what I was doing.  I didn’t say these words to placate Shelly or use extreme will power while still being upset.  I actually was able to stop the upset and then say words that were true for me.

How did I learn to do that?  I started asking myself what meaning I was giving Shelly’s behavior and comments.  And then I used two steps of the Lefkoe Belief Process to get rid of that meaning.

First I figured out two or three other meanings for whatever Shelly had done or said, other than the one I have given it.  If it had other valid meanings, the one I had couldn’t be “the truth.” Then I asked myself if I could literally “see” the meaning I had given her actions and statements.  Obviously I never could “see” the meaning I had given.

So I realized the meaning existed only in my mind.  What she was doing and saying had no inherent meaning.  The only meaning was the one I had given it.

As you know if you’ve eliminated at least one belief using the Lefkoe Belief Process, events that have no meaning can’t make us feel anything.  So the upset that I thought Shelly had “caused” was, in fact, caused by the meaning I had given what Shelly did and said. When that become real, the upset literally disappeared.

So how did I get the award?  I created the reward myself and printed it out after a very special day. She had gotten angry at something I had said and done, and before I ever reacted to her, I asked myself: What does Shelly’s reaction to me really mean?  When I answered, nothing, I had no reaction to her anger at all.  None.  And then I said what I had been saying when I had gotten off it during an argument (but his time it was before the argument ever started), “I can see how you could get upset by what I did and said.  And if you are angry, that’s okay.  And I love you.” And I said it with a smile.

It’s very hard to argue with someone who is not arguing back.  She calmed down in a matter of minutes.  Later that day I asked Shelly to give me the award I had created for getting off it the fastest ever … a time that could never be beaten … because I never got on it to begin with.

Remember, events have no inherent meaning, so nothing your loved one (or anyone else) does can upset you or make you angry. (If this isn’t real for you, eliminate a couple of limiting beliefs without charge at http://recreateyourlife.com and it will become real).  What produces the upset or anger is the meaning you make up to explain why the other person did what they did.

For example, if your partner doesn’t do something you asked her to do and then you give the event the meaning that you can’t get what you want, you will get angry.  If you give the event the meaning that your partner doesn’t care about what you want, you will be hurt or upset.  If you say that your partner’s behavior could have many different meanings and, in fact, has no inherent meaning, you will feel nothing.  You probably will just calmly do it yourself or ask your partner again if she will do it.

And that is something you can learn to do with practice (and, obviously, the more beliefs and conditionings you eliminate, the easier it is to do).

I haven’t always been able to do that since that day, but I do most of the time with Shelly and I even learned how to do it with my daughter Brittany when she was 14 (she’s now 21 and in college).

I had always had a very close relationship with Brittany. She would tell me what she was thinking and feeling quite often. I usually visited Brittany after she came home from school and asked her how her day went and we had a nice chat.  When she reached 13-14 years old, she changed.  I joke that she was captured by aliens who left one of their own in her place, because my daughter couldn’t not possibly have acted the way my daughter acted between the ages of 13 and 18-19.  (In fact this is a natural part of a child’s development.)

At any rate, by the time she was a freshman in high school she had started getting angry at me frequently, telling me I was annoying (and worse), saying she didn’t feel like talking, and asking me to leave her room.

Although I would comply, I would leave upset.  Why upset?  Because the meaning I was giving her behavior was she was ruining our relationship (which was very important to me), that she was angry with me, that I couldn’t talk to her any more, etc.  If that’s what her behavior meant, that was upsetting to me.

I asked myself, what else could it mean?  She was individuating, as she should be doing. She had a problem with one of her teachers.  Her hormones were raging.  She had some difficulties with friends during the day.  Etc.  Did I ever “see” that something fundamental had happened to “ruin” our relationship?  That I wouldn’t ever be able to talk to her the way we had in the past? No, I didn’t see that.  I only saw her behavior, which could have many different meanings other than the one I had given it.

So one day, as a result of doing the type of thinking I just described, I didn’t get upset.  I merely got up and left the room without saying a word.  And after I left the room and closed her door, I said: “Honey, I hear a daughter who loves her dad very much and who’s probably having a hard day.  Sorry about that. I love you too sweetheart.”

As I walked away I heard a shoe bounce off the door.  Ten minutes later she came out of her room, threw her arms around me, kissed me, and apologized for being shitty.

She acted that badly and worse hundreds of times over the next 4-5 years but for the most part I was able to react without reacting.  And it led to an incredibly close bond being formed between us.  She knew I loved her unconditionally and would always be there for her because I didn’t withdraw my love when she treated me badly.

It probably will take practice to give a different meaning to someone else’s behavior, but when you do, arguments will become a thing of the past.  Relationships will improve dramatically.  And the quality of your life will skyrocket.  And you’ll be able to create your own “Get off it the fastest” award.

If you haven’t yet eliminated at least one of your limiting self-esteem beliefs using the Lefkoe Belief Process, go to http://www.recreateyourlife.com/free where you can eliminate one limiting belief free.

Please feel free to share my blog posts with anyone you think might be interested (as long as you tell people where they came from) and to provide a link from your own website or blog.  http://mortylefkoe.com

To purchase DVD programs that we guarantee to eliminate eight of the most common daily problems people face, go to http://www.recreateyourlife.com/store.

Follow me on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/mortylefkoe and join our fan page on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LefkoeInstitute) to get my latest insights on the role of beliefs in our lives.

Finally, to receive notice of new blog posts, please fill out the following form.

copyright ©2010 Morty Lefkoe

Share your enthusiasm with your Facebook or Twitter friends, just click a button below.
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in Uncategorized.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , .


What is My Job As A Parent?

Email this article to a friend Email this article to a friend

“How many times do I have to tell you?”

“What am I ever going to do with you?”

“What’s wrong with you?”

“Don’t you ever listen?”

Imagine yourself to be a young child listening to your parents repeatedly ask you questions like these.  … If you stop for a few moments, listen to these words inside your head, and experience what it feels like, you will have a clear picture of what far too many children feel every day.

But what’s even worse than the momentary hurt you probably felt as a child are the beliefs that you probably formed if your parents used words like this day after day, year after year. You’d probably conclude: There’s something wrong with me.  I’m not good enough.  I’m not capable. Mistakes and failure are bad.

As parents we would be horrified to discover that many of our conversations with our children result in these beliefs.  Nonetheless, speaking to them this way has a significant negative impact on them, not the least of which is a negative sense of themselves due to low self-esteem.

For over 25 years we have been working with people who’ve had a wide variety of dysfunctional behavioral or emotional patterns.  Some were relatively minor, such as the inability to express feelings, procrastination, and obsessing about what others thought about them. Some were serious, such as eating disorders, chronic depression or anxiety, and phobias.  We’ve helped these people with the Lefkoe Belief Process® (LBP), a technique I developed that allows people to quickly and permanently eliminate the specific beliefs that are responsible for any undesirable behavior or feeling.  When the beliefs disappear, the patterns do also.  (To use the LBP to eliminate one negative self-esteem belief without charge, go to: http://www.recreateyourlife.com.)

In session after session, hour after hour, we have heard thousands of clients describe the experiences they had with their parents, most of whom loved their children and meant well, that led the clients to form the beliefs they were trying to eliminate: “My mom and dad always did …, they never did …, they always said …, they never said ….”

In the parenting e-Book my wife Shelly and I co-wrote, Guide to Effective Parenting, we explain in detail how what parents do and don’t do, say and don’t say, provide their children with the experiences that the children interpret into beliefs.  Those beliefs, in turn, then determine their behavior and emotions and, ultimately, their lives—for better or for worse.  (For information about this e-Book, go to http://www.lefkoeinstitute.com/parenting-ebook.html.)

Shelly and I have read numerous books on parenting and have taught countless parenting workshops.  Nonetheless, we still found ourselves doing some things that were interpreted negatively by our two girls when they were younger.  But we finally got in the habit of asking ourselves the question after we interacted with our children: What has my child just concluded?  When we think the answer is “probably something negative,” we go back to our children to apologize and reopen the discussion.

As an example, one day when our daughter Brittany was about five years old (she’s now 21!) Shelly went into the bathroom before bedtime to brush Brittany’s teeth.  Our daughter flatly refused, being the independent young lady that she is.  After all of Shelly’s parenting skills and tools failed, she found herself physically overpowering our daughter with one arm around her neck and one hand with the toothbrush in her mouth.  After a few moments she regained her sanity and realized what she was doing.  She stopped immediately and apologized to Brittany.

Shelly realized that, as important as brushing Brittany’s teeth was, far more important was what our daughter would conclude about herself and life out of that interaction if repeated consistently.  A couple of possibilities include: I’m powerless or What I want doesn’t matter. (Rarely do just a few experiences lead to negative beliefs.  A number of experiences usually are required before we reach specific negative conclusions about ourselves and life.)

How can we get our children to do what needs to be done (teeth that don’t get brushed do get cavities) without them forming negative beliefs about themselves?  Knowing how to interact with our children in a way that facilitates a healthy self-esteem and a positive sense of life is not self-evident. There are many books and courses that provide excellent skills and tools.  One of the best techniques is to ask your children what to do and give them a choice. When Brittany didn’t want to go to the bathroom to brush her teeth, we learned to ask her how she’d like to go—with Shelly leading a parade and her following (you should have seen Shelly as a drum major!), with her in my arms or on my back, or did she want to meet me there in five minutes?

Most of us think we are successful parents if we get our children to behave properly, to learn what we think they need to learn, and to be happy. The question we suggest you ask yourself is: At what cost? If you succeed in achieving what you want for your children, but they form negative self-esteem beliefs, such as, I’m not good enough or I’m not worthwhile, or negative beliefs about life, such as, Life’s difficult or I’ll never get what I want, was your behavior really “successful”?  In other words, are the benefits you achieved short term with your children worth the long-term cost?

I am not saying that our children’s behavior on a daily basis, the information they acquire from us, and their happiness are not important.  Of course they are.  What I’m saying is that the single factor that has the greatest impact on whether or not your children achieve true happiness and satisfaction in life is a healthy self-esteem and a positive sense of life.  Nothing we do, learn or feel when we’re young will have as much influence on our adult life as the fundamental beliefs we form and take into adulthood.

To make this real, let’s assume that your children have one of the two following sets of beliefs: I’m not good enough; There’s something wrong with me; I’m not deserving; I’m not loveable; I don’t matter—or: I am good enough; I’m worthwhile just because I am, not for any reason; I’m loveable; I matter.

Which set of beliefs would most likely lead to anxiety and depression? To substance abuse? To teenage pregnancy? To eating disorders? To satisfying relationships? To a productive career?  To a truly satisfying life?

Given the critical importance of beliefs, what should be the primary role of parents?  Influencing behavior?  Teaching information?  Making their children happy?—or assisting their children to form positive beliefs about themselves and life?

If you chose the latter, the best way I know of to insure that you are getting your job as a parent done is constantly to ask yourself the question: What are my children likely to conclude about themselves and life as a result of this interaction we just had?  If it is a negative decision, go back, apologize and clean it up.  If it is a positive decision, congratulations!  You got your job done.

P.S.  Several of you wrote and said I never finished the story about my argument with Shelly in my post last week.  So here the end of the story: As soon as I realized that my upset really had nothing to do with her, and was the result of conditioning, I told her that, apologized for getting upset at her and withdrawing, and that was the end of it. We actually have a game when we have an argument: Who can “get off it” the fastest.  More and more often I don’t get hooked at all so I don’t even have to get off it, because I never get on it.

If you haven’t yet eliminated at least one of your limiting self-esteem beliefs using the Lefkoe Belief Process, go to http://www.recreateyourlife.com/free where you can eliminate one limiting belief free.

Please share my blog posts with anyone you think might be interested (as long as you tell people where they came from) and provide a link from your own website or blog.   http://mortylefkoe.com

To purchase DVD programs that we guarantee to eliminate eight of the most common daily problems people face, go to http://www.recreateyourlife.com/store.

Follow me on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/mortylefkoe and join our fan page on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LefkoeInstitute) to get my latest insights on the role of beliefs in our lives.

Finally, to receive notice of new blog posts, please fill out the following form.

copyright ©2010 Morty Lefkoe

Share your enthusiasm with your Facebook or Twitter friends, just click a button below.
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in Uncategorized.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .


I Had a Meltdown

Email this article to a friend Email this article to a friend

Several days ago I had a meltdown. I was driving with my wife Shelly and made a couple of suggestions to her.  We were having our annual Valentine’s Day party in a few days and we needed to make sure we had someone to help us park cars and we had to ask the neighbors if we could park some of them on their property.  (We live on a hill and there aren’t a lot of parking spaces up here.) So I reminded her to make sure she handled these two items soon, because last year they had been left to the last minute and we didn’t reach all our neighbors when we called at the last minute.

She got annoyed and started to tell me all the things she had to do to and asked why didn’t I handle these two items.  (She decorates the house, does the shopping, and makes all the desserts for about 50 people.) I said that I would do whatever she asked me to do.  But she got annoyed that I hadn’t volunteered to do these two things and felt that I had been making her wrong for not handling these items yet.

As can happen in these situations, for reasons I’ve yet to figure out, it was only a few minutes before we were in a big argument.  I felt Shelly was attacking me without good reason and I got really upset.  It was a total meltdown: I felt unsafe around Shelly, I was afraid to talk to her because I thought she might use whatever I said against me, I felt that she had no compassion for me, I didn’t trust her, I felt withdrawn, and my chest actually hurt.

I’m usually able to change how the world occurs for me.  I can identify the meaning I’m giving my current circumstances and change it, so that the way the world  occurs for me changes. And when the way the world occurs for me changes, my thoughts, feelings and actions change also. (See my blog posts that describe what I mean by “occurring”:  http://mortylefkoe.com/121509; http://mortylefkoe.com/122209; http://mortylefkoe.com/122909. )

Because I couldn’t identify how the situation was occurring to me and because the feeling was so intense, I had the sense that my reaction was due to more than merely the way the situation was occurring to me. But whatever the source of the upset, there was nothing I could do to stop it at the moment.

(Earlier in my life when I was in a similar situations, I was upset.  This time I was aware I was having an upset.  Big difference! In other words, as a result of having used the Who Am I Really? Process many times I could distinguish my Self from myself, and “I” (the creator) could almost watch “myself” (the creation) being upset.  So on some level I wasn’t totally taken over by the intense feelings, but, on the other hand, I couldn’t make them stop.  (See my two blog posts on how to do this: http://www.mortylefkoe.com/how-to-eliminate-upsets-and-suffering-from-your-life-part-1/ and http://www.mortylefkoe.com/042709/.)

The next day as I thought about my feelings (I still had most of the same feelings as the night before, but much less intense) I remembered something I had read in a book by Daniel Siegel, The Developing Mind.

He distinguishes between two types of memory: “implicit” and “explicit.”  Implicit memory is usually formed during the first year and a half of life, and does not required conscious processing (which is impossible at that age).  When having an implicit memory later in life we experience it fully, as if the experience is happening at that moment, and we do not realize that it is a memory.

Explicit memory requires conscious awareness at the time of the event and usually is recalled in context, in other words, we remember an experience at a particular time, at a specific place, with specific people, etc.  With this type of memory we are conscious that our current experience really is a memory from the past.

It is not important to understand all the implications of the two types of memory as long as you understand that with explicit memory we usually know that the experience we are having in the present is a memory from the past, as distinct from an implicit memory where the experience of the past feels as if it is happening right now.

So back to my meltdown.  When I was unable to find any meaning I was giving the situation with Shelly that could explain my severe reaction, I suspected that conditioning was involved and that I was recalling an implicit memory: Something she did was stimulating me to recall a memory of being upset, withdrawn, and not feeling safe from my childhood. If that was true I could use the Lefkoe Stimulus Process (LStP) to de-condition the conditioning.

(If you’ve used any of our DVD packages you’ve used the LStP to de-conditioning stimuli that cause negative feelings, such as fear caused by rejection or not meeting the expectations of others, or anger caused by being told what to do.  I wrote in detail about this process in a blog post, http://www.mortylefkoe.com/how-to-eliminate-some-of-your-negative-emotions%E2%80%A6-for-good/.)

Here is what I finally figured out had caused the meltdown.  As an infant my mom frequently got angry and yelled at me, and I had no idea why.  As an infant I must have felt unsafe and upset, and withdrew.  That happened many times.  (I don’t have a direct memory of these events, but I was told things by relatives and I remember my mom from later in life, so it is very real to me that this actually happened to me.)

So today whenever I feel unjustly attacked, childhood memories of feeling unsafe get pulled up.  And when that happens, it feels like my overwhelming feeling state is a new feeling produced in response to the current events, when in reality I am remembering an old feeling that had been produced under similar circumstances as a child.

After using the LStP on this conditioning, feeling unjustly attacked has been de-conditioned and no longer has the power to produce the same reaction.

I’ve told you this story for several reasons, the main one being that there is always a explanation for the unpleasant mental states that all of us find ourselves in from time to time.  And there is a way out of them: Either eliminate the beliefs that cause them, de-condition the stimuli that cause them, or change how the world is occurring for you at the moment.  You are not doomed to having to live with negative thoughts and feelings.  Your birthright is joy and it is attainable by all of us.

If you haven’t yet eliminated at least one of your limiting self-esteem beliefs using the Lefkoe Belief Process, go to http://www.recreateyourlife.com/free where you can eliminate one limiting belief free.

Please share my blog posts with anyone you think might be interested (as long as you tell people where they came from) and provide a link from your own website or blog.   http://mortylefkoe.com

To purchase DVD programs that we guarantee to eliminate eight of the most common daily problems people face, go to http://www.recreateyourlife.com/store.

Follow me on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/mortylefkoe and join our fan page on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LefkoeInstitute) to get my latest insights on the role of beliefs in our lives.

Finally, to receive notice of new blog posts, please fill out the following form.

copyright ©2010 Morty Lefkoe

Share your enthusiasm with your Facebook or Twitter friends, just click a button below.
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in Uncategorized.


How the Lefkoe Belief Process Works, Part 2

Email this article to a friend Email this article to a friend

THIS IS PART 2 OF “HOW THE LEFKOE BELIEF PROCESS WORKS.”  FOR PART 1, SEE THE PRIOR WEEK’S POST (HTTP://MORTYLEFKOE.COM/020210.

For many years we thought that this was all that was necessary to eliminate a belief.  A few years ago we realized that it was enough for “visual” people, people who know reality by seeing it, who are about 80% of the population. But a significant number of people are emotionally kinesthetic: they know reality through their feelings.

When they are asked the question in the Lefkoe Belief Process (LBP): Imagine being a child and observing the events that led you to form your belief; didn’t it seem as if you could see the belief?—such people answer: I didn’t see it; I felt it.

So a couple of years ago we added a new step to the LBP specifically for such people.  We ask:  Didn’t it seem as if the events that led you to form the belief made you feel (your belief)?  The answer is always, yes.  We then point out that they had just acknowledged that the events had no meaning, and that meaningless events can’t possibly make you feel anything.

So we ask: What really caused the feeling? We get the client to realize that the feeling was caused by the meaning she gave the events, and had she given the events a different meaning, she would have had a different feeling.  She gets that reality didn’t cause the feeling; the meaning she created did. At which point, the belief is gone for kinesthetic people.

Beliefs Literally Disappear

When we recognize that something we have held as a belief (the truth) is, in fact, only one of several alternative meanings of what actually occurred (a truth), when we realize that we never saw the belief in the world, and when we realize the events had no meaning until we gave them one, the belief literally disappears. Remember, a belief is a statement about reality that we think is the truth.  When it gets transformed into only a truth, it is no longer a belief and no longer runs our lives.

When the belief disappears, there is usually an observable change in clients’ bodies and demeanor. They look (and usually report that they feel) lighter, as if they had been relieved of a heavy burden.  When they are asked to repeat the words of the belief, they say that they no longer believe it, that the words of the belief sound empty and meaningless to them.  There is a clear difference between the experience of saying the belief at this point compared to when it was first identified.

Distinguish Between the Creator and the Creation

At this point I ask the client to notice that his life has been consistent with his belief—even though it never really was the truth.  He grasps that his life hasn’t been consistent with the truth about him; his life has been consistent with his beliefs, with whatever meaning he “made up” to understand the earlier events.   The client comes to realize that if someone had helped him when he was forming the belief to see the additional interpretations he has just named, and he had gone into life with an interpretation other than the one he actually did form, his life would have been consistent with that belief.  In other words, the client experiences that he creates his beliefs and his beliefs determine his life—which makes him the creator of his life.

The client discovers that he ultimately is not the sum total of his beliefs—along with the behavior and feelings that accompany those beliefs—he is the creator of those beliefs.  He is not merely a “creation,” he also is the “creator” of the creation.

Here is how to facilitate that realization: Assist the client to realize that there had to be an “interpreter” before there could be an “interpretation”; a belief creator before there could be a belief.  In other words, who you really are is not your beliefs; you are that which generated the beliefs.

After the client makes the distinction between himself as a creator and a creation, I ask what his experience is, right now, as the creator of his life.  The answer virtually every client gives is some variation of: calm, serene, peaceful, infinite possibilities, no limitations, whole, complete, alive, powerful, and nothing missing.  He appears to enter an non-ordinary state of consciousness in which he experiences that anything is possible and that he has no limitations.

A Brief Summary of the LBP

As a result of doing the LBP we discover that the events and circumstances of our lives, as such, have virtually no effect later in life on our behavior, our attitudes, and our emotions. The meaning we assign to what happens, on the other hand, has a profound effect.  Therefore, by changing our interpretation of what happened, we can radically change the effect of past events on our present and future life.

To sum up what occurs for us when we use the LBP to change our behavior and beliefs: We recognize that the belief that is responsible for the current, undesirable behavioral or emotional pattern is nothing more than one arbitrary, but valid, meaning of what actually occurred earlier in life. When it is clear that we never saw the belief in the world, the belief becomes transformed into just one of many arbitrary meanings, at which point it literally disappears as the truth.

I want to stress that the essence of the LBP is not merely getting rid of beliefs and changing our behavior and feelings.  Equally as important is creating ourselves as the creator of our beliefs and—because our beliefs determine our behavior, emotions, and perceptions of reality—as the creator of our lives.

The LBP ultimately is more spiritual than psychotherapeutic. By spiritual I mean a sense of ourselves as beyond or distinct from who we normally think we are, namely, our body, our beliefs, and the behavior and feelings that stem from our beliefs. The LBP appears to be a cognitive gateway to an non-ordinary state of consciousness in which we create and then experience ourselves as alright just the way we are, as whole and complete, as calm and serene, with unlimited possibilities and no restrictions outside of ourselves, and with nothing missing.

If you haven’t yet eliminated at least one of your limiting self-esteem beliefs using the Lefkoe Belief Process, go to http://www.recreateyourlife.com/free where you can eliminate one limiting belief free.

Please share my blog posts with anyone you think might be interested (as long as you tell people where they came from) and to provide a link from your own website or blog.   http://mortylefkoe.com

To purchase DVD programs that we guarantee to eliminate eight of the most common daily problems people face, go to http://www.recreateyourlife.com/store.

Follow me on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/mortylefkoe and join our fan page on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LefkoeInstitute) to get my latest insights on the role of beliefs in our lives.

Finally, to receive notice of new blog posts, please fill out the following form.

copyright ©2001 Morty Lefkoe

Share your enthusiasm with your Facebook or Twitter friends, just click a button below.
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in Uncategorized.


How the Lefkoe Belief Process works, Part 1

Email this article to a friend Email this article to a friend

Many of you who have eliminated at least one belief using the Lefkoe Belief Process have asked me for more details on how it actually works.

In order to provide you with a relatively complete answer (it would take me several days to teach you how to use it effectively), I’ve written a two-part post.

The Lefkoe Belief Process (LBP)  begins with the client describing an undesirable pattern of behavior or feelings that he has been trying unsuccessfully to change.  Feeling patterns could include fear, hostility, shyness, anxiety, depression, or worrying about what people think of you. Behavioral patterns could include phobias, relationships that never seem to work, violence, procrastination, unwillingness to confront people, an inability to express our feelings, sexual dysfunction, or anti-social behavior.

One client presented the following undesirable pattern: “I can do enough to get by, but I don’t apply myself completely to one thing. I always feel as though I haven’t done enough, both at home and at work. Wherever I am, I should be someplace else, doing something else. I never do a good enough job. Sometimes I’m satisfied with what I do, but I never have a sense of a real completion. Never any rest.”

I responded by pointing out that people frequently explain their behavior by pointing to a cause other than themselves, such as their spouse, their boss, the economy, or some other “circumstances.” I requested that the client assume that the source of our behavior and feelings is our beliefs, not anything in reality. Many clients already agree that their beliefs have this power, but agreement is not required for the LBP to be effective. One must, however, be willing accept that idea for the duration of the session.

Finding a Belief

I then asked the client what he believed, at the moment, that logically could account for the current, undesirable pattern that he just had just presented to me. This step is not the same as asking the client “why” he acts as he does. Most people either will say they have no idea why they do what they do, or they will come up with a multitude of reasons. A client’s “story,” interpretations, and analysis are not at all relevant in the LBP.  This step is designed to elicit one or more beliefs (that he probably was not conscious of before the LBP began) that logically would manifest as his undesirable pattern.

One belief that this client discovered is I’m not good enough.  This belief at least partially explains why he never had a sense of doing a good job, of really being satisfied with whatever he did.  In other words, the pattern is the result of the belief(s), and it would be virtually impossible to permanently change the pattern as long as the belief(s) existed. (There were several other beliefs and all of them had to be eliminated before the pattern disappeared totally.)

The Source of Beliefs

Once the belief is identified, the client is asked to say the words of the belief out loud to confirm that he actually does hold this belief.  Then, the client is asked to look for the earliest circumstances or events that led him to form the belief. Fundamental beliefs about life and about oneself—for example, self-esteem-type beliefs—usually are formed before the age of six.  For the most part they are based on interactions with our parents and other primary caretakers, if any. Beliefs in other areas of life, such as work and society, are formed at the time those areas of life are encountered.

Although the client usually can identify the relevant early events in five or ten minutes, at times he spends as much as half an hour recalling various events from his childhood. At some point he identifies the pattern of events that led him to form the belief in question. My experience with over 13,000 clients indicates that beliefs rarely are formed based on only one or two events. Usually a great many similar events are required.

When I asked this particular client the source of his belief, he described a childhood in which his mother was always telling him what to do and what not to do. Nothing he ever did was good enough for her. He never received any praise and was criticized a lot.

Don’t Invalidate a Client’s Beliefs

The next step is to have the client realize that his current belief was, in fact, a reasonable interpretation of his childhood circumstances and that most children probably would have reached a similar conclusion, given their experience and knowledge at that time in their life. Our beliefs are almost always a reasonable explanation for the events we observe at the time we observe them. Thus the client is never told that his beliefs are irrational or wrong.

Other Interpretations

The client then is asked to make up some additional interpretations of, or meanings for, the same earlier circumstances, which he hadn’t thought of at the time. In other words, the client as a child observed his mother doing and saying various things over a long period of time. The meaning he gave to the events was I’m not good enough. What the client is asked to do in the session is make up additional meanings or interpretations of his mother’s behavior.

To continue the illustration we’ve been using, other reasonable interpretations of his mother’s behavior could include:

·            My mother thought I wasn’t good enough, but she was wrong.

·            I wasn’t good enough as a child, but I might be when I grow up.

·            I wasn’t good enough by my mother’s standards, but I might be by the standards of others.

·            My mother is a very critical person and would act that way with everyone, whether they were good enough or not.

·            My mother’s behavior with me had nothing to do with whether I was good enough or not; it was a function of my mother’s beliefs from her childhood.

·            My mother’s behavior with me had nothing to do with whether I was good enough or not; it was a function of my mother’s parenting style.

Each of these statements is as reasonable a meaning for his mother’s behavior as the one he came up with as a child.  The point here is not to convince the client that his belief is unreasonable, he just needs to realize that there are many different meanings, each one of which is logically consistent with the events he experienced.

Did You See It In The World?

Next the client was asked if, when he formed the belief as a child, it seemed as if he could see in the world that I’m not good enough. Because it feels as if we “discovered” or “viewed” our beliefs in the world, the answer is always, yes. It seemed to the client that every time his mother criticized him or failed to praise something he was proud of, he could “see” that he wasn’t good enough.  He was so certain that his belief was out in the world to be seen that he said to me, “If you were there in my house, you would have seen it too.”

The distinction you want the client to make is between the events of his childhood, which have no inherent meaning, and the meaning he attributed to the events. The principles that underlie this distinction are: Events have no inherent meaning.  There’s no meaning in the world. All meaning is in our minds. All beliefs are merely the meaning we assign to events.

The way to get the client to make that distinction is to then ask:  “Is it clear, right now, that you never saw the belief in the world?”

In other words, you want the client to realize that he never did see that I’m not good enough. All he really saw was his mother’s statements and behaviors. I’m not good enough was only one interpretation of the events he actually did see.

After the client realized that he never really did see his belief in the world, I asked: “If you didn’t see I’m not good enough in the world, where has it been all these years?”  He pointed to his head and replied: “In my mind.”

At this point I asked the client, did the events that led you to form the belief have a meaning before you gave them a meaning?  Do they have an inherent meaning?  It usually takes a short conversation before most clients really understand that events have no inherent meaning, that all meaning is in our mind.

TO BE CONTINUED NEXT WEEK

If you haven’t yet eliminated at least one of your limiting self-esteem beliefs using the Lefkoe Belief Process, go to http://www.recreateyourlife.com/free where you can eliminate one limiting belief free.

Please feel free to share my blog posts with anyone you think might be interested (as long as you tell people where they came from) and to provide a link from your own website or blog to my blog: http://mortylefkoe.com.

To purchase DVD programs that we guarantee to eliminate eight of the most common daily problems people face, go to http://www.recreateyourlife.com/store.

Follow me on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/mortylefkoe and join our fan page on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LefkoeInstitute) to get my latest insights on the role of beliefs in our lives.

Finally, to receive notice of new blog posts, please fill out the following form.

copyright ©2010 Morty Lefkoe

Share your enthusiasm with your Facebook or Twitter friends, just click a button below.
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in Uncategorized.

Tagged with , , , .


What does love depend on?

Email this article to a friend Email this article to a friend

I’ve spent the past week in Puerto Rico at the semi-annual meeting of the Transformational Leadership Council.  This is a group of transformational leaders, formed by Chicken Soup for the Soul co-creator Jack Canfield, and includes John Gray, Paul Sheely, Joe Vitale, Steve Pavlina, and Stewart Emery.

We have a lot of workshops where we learn from each other, but mainly we just enjoy each other’s company.  Every six months when I arrive I feel as if I am coming home, because I am with people who have a similar vision, passion, and commitment in life: to improve the quality of people’s lives.

This past week I had an insight about love that I’d like to share with you.  Let me start at the beginning.

When I married Shelly almost 29 years ago she asked me why I loved her.  I answered her, “Just because I say so.”

She didn’t like this answer.  She wanted to know which qualities about her made me love her.  I kept insisting that I only loved her because I said so, not for any particular reason.

At some point I explained what I meant.  “If I love you for specific reasons, then my love is conditioned on you being a certain way.  If you stopped being that way or if you weren’t that way at a given time, I wouldn’t love you.  But if I love you just because I say so, then my love is unconditional and I can and will love you no matter what you do or don’t do.” I’ve repeated this to Shelly many times during the past 29 years and I think it’s finally okay with her.

As a result of this unconditional love, whenever I didn’t feel love toward Shelly at any given moment, I realized that I was not creating it and that it was up to me to figure out why and to start creating it again. I wasn’t blaming her for anything and I wasn’t waiting for her to change in some way.  That gave me complete control over the way I felt about her, in other words, there was not only nothing she had to do to make me love her, there was nothing she could do that would lead to me not loving her.

Now back to this past week’s meeting.  I noticed throughout most of the week that I had the experience of loving—deeply and profoundly—the 70 people who were there.  I noticed that I wasn’t loving them for any reason.  It was as if I was filled with love and I directed it toward whoever showed up in my space.  It was like being in an altered state of consciousness that felt so good that I wished it could be in it all the time.

I could tell you what I liked and admired about each of the people, but that isn’t why I loved them.  Because some of those qualities are more important to me than others, I enjoy spending time with some people more than others. But the love I felt this past week had nothing to do with those qualities.  (This is true about Shelly also; there are a lot of things about her I like and admire, and a lot of things we have in common, so I enjoy being with her more than anyone else.  She is not only my wife, she also is my best friend.)

I noticed that the love I felt made no distinction for gender; the love I experienced for men was the same as the love I felt for women.  I also noticed, however, that woman had an easier time returning the love than most of the men.  I’m not sure if this is a cultural thing, whereby most men have a harder time than women expressing feelings in general, especially love, and especially for other men.

Because the love I experienced was unconditional, it was independent of the response I got from the other person.  I didn’t feel more love for people who I experienced loved me back than I did for people who didn’t express love for me.

After the meeting was over I started reflecting on the love I had been feeling during the prior week and the love I feel for Shelly.

In Shelly’s case I was aware that I was generating the love I felt for her.  But I had always thought that the love I felt for others was accidental, in other words, sometimes I felt it and sometimes I didn’t, and I never knew when I would feel it or why.

I now realize that whenever I experienced this type of deep love for everyone in my space, I was creating it.  I didn’t know that I was, but I was.  And now that I know where that wonderful experience came from (namely, me), I am committed to learning how to make the process conscious and how to create it consistently in my life.

I’m not sure exactly what I did to “turn the love on,” but I think one crucial element is to just be with someone without any judgments, focusing on who they really are and not their “creation.”  Another crucial element is to get in touch with who I really am, namely, the creator of my life, not the creation that gets created.  When I am able to allow who I really am to see who you really are, all there is is love.


If you haven’t yet eliminated at least one of your limiting self-esteem beliefs using the Lefkoe Belief Process, go to http://www.recreateyourlife.com/free where you can eliminate one limiting belief free.

Please feel free to share my blog posts with anyone you think might be interested (as long as you tell people where they came from) and to provide a link from your own website or blog to this blog: http://mortylefkoe.com.

To purchase DVD programs that we guarantee to eliminate eight of the most common daily problems people face, go to http://www.recreateyourlife.com/store.

Follow me on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/mortylefkoe and join our fan page on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LefkoeInstitute) to get my latest insights on the role of beliefs in our lives.

Finally, to receive notice of new blog posts, please fill out the following form.

Copyright © 2010 Morty Lefkoe

Share your enthusiasm with your Facebook or Twitter friends, just click a button below.
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in Uncategorized.


Eliminating Beliefs in Organizations

Email this article to a friend Email this article to a friend

You probably already know that The Lefkoe Method can improve your personal life. Did you also know that it can be used to improve your work environment?

Although the Lefkoe Institute is not doing much corporate work right now, we have helped over 10,000 employees from over 50 companies—ranging from Fortune 500 to small family owned businesses—to change their organizational beliefs and their individual beliefs about their jobs. As a result, those organizations were able to produce significant change and improved results. Here is a fascinating case history of how the Lefkoe Belief Process (LBP) was used effectively in one of those companies.

One small manufacturing company we helped a few years ago had a typical top-down managerial hierarchy, with the bosses making all the decisions and the workers doing little more than following orders. Morale was low. Results were only fair.

Our goal was to totally transform the way the company operated, with a focus on giving the workers a tremendous amount of authority to make day-to-day decisions, with the managers acting as support instead of as “bosses.”

We conducted workshops with all of the company’s employees during which each eliminated one personal belief and all eliminated a bunch of limiting beliefs about their company. We taught them how to use a simplified version of the LBP.

Within days many of the employees started making suggestions for improvements in the company. (Change beliefs and behavior changes effortlessly.) Supervisors were allowing workers to make more and more decisions on their own. A lot of excitement was generated; many of the changes workers suggested were instituted.

At this point Bob, the manager of a department of about thirty-five workers, went on vacation for a week. Two days after he left, Jean, one of the supervisors who reported to him, handled something in her own that everyone had agreed would be done by the workers. When Rick, one of the workers, complained to her, Jean said, in effect, “So what? I’m still the supervisor.” When Rick continued to protest, Jean took him to the Operations Manager’s office.

The other workers observed the heated argument and most of them concluded, “We’re back where we started. Nothing has really changed. If you speak up you get into trouble.”

The next week Bob returned from vacation to discover that morale and productivity had sunk to a new low, with virtually no suggestions or worker participation. What would most managers do in a situation like this? Talk to the supervisor involved in the altercation? Yes, but that in itself would have little effect on the other thirty-some workers. Talk to the workers individually and as a group, telling them that one incident isn’t really important and that the new era of openness and involvement will continue? Yes, but through what filter will anything the manager says be heard by the workers? “I hear what you’re saying, but you weren’t here last week, and you didn’t see with your own eyes as I did that ‘We’re back where we started. Nothing has really changed. If you speak up you get into trouble.’”

Here’s what Bob actually did. He called a meeting of the department’s entire workforce and asked that someone explain exactly what happened while he was away. One of the workers described the incident between Jean and Rick. Bob thanked him and replied, “So most of you concluded, ‘We’re back where we started. Nothing has really changed. If you speak up you get into trouble.’ Right?”

A scattering of “Yeah” could be heard.

Bob continued, “That’s a reasonable conclusion, based on what happened between Jean and Rick. Right now, however, I’d like you to play a little game with me. It’s called Possibilities. I’d like you to tell me at least four or five other things that last week’s incident could possibly mean. I’m not trying to invalidate your conclusion, which is as good as any other we’ll find. I’d just like you to tell me what other interpretations might be possible?”

After a few minutes the answers started coming from the floor.
* It could mean that Jean hasn’t bought into our empowerment program, but all the other supervisors have.
* It could mean that Jean has it in for Rick, but she wouldn’t be a problem for any other worker.
* It could mean that Jean was having a bad day and she is as committed to the new empowerment program as anyone.
* It could mean that Jean is willing to delegate most of her work except for the job involved in last week’s problem.

After several more responses, Bob said, “Can you see that what most of you concluded—‘We’re back where we started. Nothing has really changed. If you speak up you get into trouble’—is only one valid interpretation of what happened, but that a number of other explanations are just as valid?”

Heads started nodding up and down.

He continued, “Didn’t it seem last week when Jean and Larry were arguing that you could see right here on the factory floor, ‘We’re back where we started. Nothing has really changed. If you speak up you get into trouble?’”

One worker yelled out, “If you had been here, Bob, you’d have seen it too!”

Bob smiled. “Did you really see that? If you did, I’d like to know, was it on the wall or the floor? Was it red or green, striped or polka-dotted? Big or small?” Bob waited a few seconds … “Or did you just see Rick and Jean arguing, and the only place—‘We’re back where we started. Nothing has really changed. If you speak up you get into trouble’—has ever been is in your mind, as an interpretation of what you really did see?” They got the point.

Bob turned to Rick. “By the way, what happened when you went to the Operations Manager’s office with Jean?”

“He told us to work it out ourselves,” Rick answered.

Bob turned back to the group. “Anything else?” He saw a lot of sheepish grins. “Let’s go to work.”

In most companies, hardly a day goes by that some employees don’t observe something and then reach a conclusion that negatively affects their behavior from then on. Usually their manager will try to change their behavior using Information + Motivation. (See my blog post, http://mortylefkoe.com/111009, on why that doesn’t work.) Sometimes if the belief surfaces—“So-and-so can’t be trusted” or “That new plan will never work”—the Lefkoe Belief Process (or a variation) can be used easily, with one employee at a time or with a large group, just as Bob did.

If you haven’t yet eliminated at least one of your limiting self-esteem beliefs using the Lefkoe Belief Process, go to http://www.recreateyourlife.com/free where you can eliminate one limiting belief free.

Please feel free to share my blog posts with anyone you think might be interested (as long as you tell people where they came from) and to provide a link from your own website or blog to this blog: http://mortylefkoe.com.

To purchase DVD programs that we guarantee to eliminate eight of the most common daily problems people face, go to http://www.recreateyourlife.com/store.

Follow me on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/mortylefkoe and join our fan page on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LefkoeInstitute) to get my latest insights on the role of beliefs in our lives.

Finally, to receive notice of new blog posts, please fill out the following form.

Copyright © 2010 Morty Lefkoe

Share your enthusiasm with your Facebook or Twitter friends, just click a button below.
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in Uncategorized.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , .


People don’t resist change

Email this article to a friend Email this article to a friend

Do you think people resist change? …  Most people answer with an emphatic: “Yes.”

I don’t think people resist change at all.

To which you might respond: “Well if people don’t resist change, why do most people not change when given reason to change?”

Good question.  Here’s my answer: Imagine that you had been doing something a certain way for a long time and you believed that you were doing it the right way.  Now imagine that I come along and tell you not to do that way any more.  I give you a lot of reasons and I promise a lot of benefits if you stop doing it your way and start doing it my way.

No matter how persuasive I might be, you and most other people probably wouldn’t change their behavior.  “Okay,” you reply, “that just proves that people resist change.”  Not necessarily.  Think about what I just said.

If you think what you are doing is right and I am telling you to do something else, what does it sound like I am asking you to do? … It would seem to you that I was telling you to do something wrong. Think about that.

We don’t resist doing something new or different—in other words, we don’t resist change. We resist doing what we think is wrong. When you really get this distinction, you will understand something about human behavior that most professionals in the training business still don’t understand.

This is a different way of looking at something I’ve written about before.  Information and motivation do not change behavior because behavior is driven by beliefs.  If you want to change behavior, change the beliefs that drive any given behavior—such as procrastination, yelling, etc.—and the behavior will change.

Here’s a real life example.  Many managers are reluctant to give their hourly employees the freedom to make decisions on their own, despite overwhelming evidence that some of the best ideas in many companies come from the hourly employees.

If such managers believe they know what needs to be done and the people they manage do not, then how they manage is right.  Asking their employees to think for themselves is wrong.  Change the belief and you change how a manager manages.

If people were generally resistant to change, then there would be little if anything we could do about it.  But if people don’t change because they believe what they are doing is right and what you (or others) want is wrong, then we are now in a position to produce change in individuals and in the world by helping people realize that their beliefs are not “the truth.” (Can you see that all political arguments are nothing more than conflicting beliefs? Consider: Global warming. How to deal with the economy. The failure in the educational system. Health care.)

How do you know someone’s belief isn’t “the truth”?  Because all beliefs are only “a truths,” the meaning we give to meaningless events. (This becomes experientially real for people when they use the Lefkoe Belief Process to eliminate a belief.)

What appears to be widespread resistance to change is nothing more than people acting consistently with their beliefs.  When people change their beliefs, change occurs naturally and effortlessly.

If you haven’t yet eliminated at least one of your limiting self-esteem beliefs using the Lefkoe Belief Process, go to http://www.recreateyourlife.com/free where you can eliminate one limiting belief free.

Please feel free to share my blog posts with anyone you think might be interested (as long as you tell people where they came from) and to provide a link from your own website or blog.

To purchase DVD programs that we guarantee to eliminate eight of the most common daily problems people face, go to http://www.recreateyourlife.com/store.

Follow me on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/mortylefkoe and join our fan page on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LefkoeInstitute) to get my latest insights on the role of beliefs in our lives.

Finally, to receive notice of new blog posts, please fill out the following form.

Copyright © 2010 Morty Lefkoe

Share your enthusiasm with your Facebook or Twitter friends, just click a button below.
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in Uncategorized.

Tagged with , , , , , , , .


Do we need to create new beliefs?

Email this article to a friend Email this article to a friend

“The Lefkoe Method is very effective at eliminating negative beliefs.  But why don’t you replace them with positive beliefs?”

This is a very common question so I decided to devote this week’s post to answering it.

For many years we did attempt to “install” positive beliefs—the opposite of the “negative” belief that was eliminated—for example, I am good enough for I’m not good enough and relationships do work for relationships don’t work.

Although the new belief felt true at the moment for most clients, it usually didn’t feel true when we checked a week or two later.  In other words, despite using several different methods to install the new beliefs, it usually didn’t work.

Is it Possible to Consciously Create New Beliefs?

Here’s why I think it is very difficult to have someone consciously create a new belief and then really believe it.  A belief is the meaning we have given meaningless events in reality.  When we do that it seems (for a visual person) that we can actually see that meaning in the world.  It is the truth.  You aren’t trying to convince yourself that the meaning is true; it is true for you.  For a kinesthetic person, once you give a meaning to events, those events make you feel that meaning every time the events occur.  Again, you aren’t trying to feel something; you can’t help but feel it.

This is the automatic process that occurs when you initially create a belief  unconsciously.  But it is very different when you consciously say the words: I am good enough or relationships do work—and hope that you will really believe the words you’ve uttered.  You are saying it more like an affirmation, as something you want to be true, rather than as something you think you can see in the world (which would mean it must be true). Even looking at recent events that could validate the new belief wasn’t consistently effective.

We also tried having clients create the new positive belief after they had gotten into the “creator” space (after using the Who Am I Really? Process).  I never kept records, but I’m not sure that this worked much better.

You Don’t Need “Positive” Beliefs

I never looked for additional techniques that might enable people to get the new beliefs to “stick” because I decided early on that it was more important for people to realize they were the creator of their lives, than they were a “healthier or better creation.”

Let me explain.  I commonly use the words “negative” and “limiting” as descriptions of certain beliefs.  In fact, however, beliefs aren’t negative or positive they are neutral.  They result in certain feelings and behavior.  If you like what they produce, you could say the beliefs are “positive,” but only because you arbitrarily like their manifestation.

Moreover, all beliefs are limiting by their very nature.  You are what you believe you are (for you) and anything else is absolutely not true (not possible). Your beliefs about people and life also create boxes; what’s outside the boxes literally does not exist for you.  (If you believe relationships always work or never work, you will interpret all relationships through that filter and no matter what you see couples do or don’t do, you will interpret it consistently with your belief.  For you, relationships inconsistent with your beliefs cannot exist.)

Live As The Creator, Not a “Better” Creation

I concluded that it was more important to live as the creator of your life (as the sculptor) rather than as any specific creation (as a specific piece of sculpture).  In the altered state of consciousness produced by the Who Am I Really? Process, you have no limitations and anything is possible.

So even if it were possible to install a new belief, I don’t think it would be particularly useful.  If you have used the WAIR? Process (which is attached at the end of the free belief-elimination processes and is available in all of our belief-elimination programs), you know that it feels as if anything is possible and that you have no limitations.  Next time you get in that space, ask yourself if the opposite of the beliefs you’ve eliminated feels true for you.  In that space they will, whether you experience them as true in day-to-day life or not.  In that altered state, you feel whole, complete, and okay just the way you are.  You feel good enough, important, and loveable.

My advice to those of you who are interested in forming positive beliefs, use the WAIR? Process daily.  Get into an altered state every day.  And it won’t be long before it gets easy to have that experience of yourself even when you aren’t using the WAIR? Process.  Wouldn’t you rather experience yourself as the creator of your life than as a “better” creation?

If you haven’t yet eliminated at least one of your limiting self-esteem beliefs using the Lefkoe Belief Process, go to http://www.recreateyourlife.com/free where you can eliminate one limiting belief free.

Please feel free to share my blog posts with anyone you think might be interested (as long as you tell people where they came from) and to provide a link from your own website or blog.

To purchase DVD programs that we guarantee to eliminate eight of the most common daily problems people face, go to http://www.recreateyourlife.com/store.

Follow me on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/mortylefkoe and join our fan page on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LefkoeInstitute) to get my latest insights on the role of beliefs in our lives.

Finally, to receive notice of new blog posts, please fill out the following form.

Copyright © 2010 Morty Lefkoe

Share your enthusiasm with your Facebook or Twitter friends, just click a button below.
  • Facebook
  • TwitThis
  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in Uncategorized.

Tagged with , , , , , , , , , .